This example appears in the Non-Parametric Recurrent Event Data Analysis article.
A health care company maintains five identical pieces of equipment used by a hospital. When a piece of equipment fails, the company sends a crew to repair it. The following table gives the failure and censoring ages for each machine, where the + sign indicates a censoring age.
Estimate the MCF values, with 95% confidence bounds.
Solution
The MCF estimates are obtained as follows:
Using the MCF variance equation, the following table of variance values can be obtained:
ID
|
Months
|
State
|
|
|
1
|
5
|
F
|
5
|
|
2
|
6
|
F
|
5
|
|
1
|
10
|
F
|
5
|
|
3
|
12
|
F
|
5
|
|
2
|
13
|
F
|
5
|
|
4
|
13
|
F
|
5
|
|
1
|
15
|
F
|
5
|
|
4
|
15
|
F
|
5
|
|
5
|
16
|
F
|
5
|
|
2
|
17
|
F
|
5
|
|
1
|
17
|
S
|
4
|
|
2
|
19
|
S
|
3
|
|
3
|
20
|
F
|
3
|
|
5
|
22
|
F
|
3
|
|
4
|
24
|
S
|
2
|
|
3
|
25
|
F
|
2
|
|
5
|
25
|
F
|
2
|
|
3
|
26
|
S
|
1
|
|
5
|
28
|
S
|
0
|
|
Using the equation for the MCF bounds and
for a 95% confidence level, the confidence bounds can be obtained as follows:
The analysis presented in this example can be performed automatically in Weibull++'s non-parametric RDA folio, as shown next.
Note: In the folio above, the
refers to failures and
refers to suspensions (or censoring ages). The results, with calculated MCF values and upper and lower 95% confidence limits, are shown next along with the graphical plot.